The month in one line
RFP 6.2b · Appendix 1496 businesses were introduced from the 1Centre hub. 325 were approved and 99 funded for the first time. FundTap advanced $7.68M across 461 funding rounds and received $297,267 in fees. Your share is $30,182, settling on 20 July 2027. The 11% tier engaged for the first time this month.
Settlement statement
RFP 6a · 6.1 · 6.2a · 6.2bThe share arises only on fees FundTap has actually received, so the chain below starts at what was funded and ends at what is paid to you. Every step is a number you can check, and every step has a row-level extract behind it.
How the tiers applied
progressive, never on the whole month| Band of monthly shareable revenue | Rate | In band | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0 to $200,000 | 10% | $200,000 | $20,000 |
| $200,000 to $2,000,000 | 11% | $92,567 | $10,182 |
| $2,000,000 to $5,000,000 | 13% | $0 | $0 |
| Above $5,000,000 | 15% | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 10.32% effective | $292,567 | $30,182 |
Each rate applies only to the revenue inside its band, never to the whole month. Your effective rate rises on its own as volume grows, with no renegotiation at any point.
Payment
the 20th of the month following| Amount | $30,182 |
| Settlement date | 20 July 2027 |
| Reference | 1C-SHARE-2027-06 |
| Method | Direct credit, remittance and row-level extract issued with payment |
| Prior month | $16,963 settled 20 June 2027, paid in full |
| Adjustments or default credits | $0 |
| Settled to date | $26,822 |
| Total including this month | $57,004 |
What is not in this month, and why
the three things partners ask aboutFees charged but not yet received
$374,887 of fees sit against rounds that are funded and not yet repaid. Nothing is shared until the customer's payment lands, so this becomes shareable in the month it is received. On a 26 day median term, most of it lands in July.
Overdue fees
$4,700 charged and excluded from your share, 1.6% of fees received. Under the terms FundTap has proposed, the share is calculated on the on-time fee only, so neither party has an incentive that depends on a customer paying late.
Defaults
$0 in credits applied. Because a share only ever arises on a fee actually received, a default creates no share and there is nothing to claw back. No credit mechanism has to be built or reconciled.
Share by month
since the pilot opened, 15 February 2027| Month | Fees received | Overdue excl. | Shareable | Share | Eff. rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2027 | $2,965 | $0 | $2,965 | $296 | 9.98% |
| Mar 2027 | $21,208 | $250 | $20,958 | $2,096 | 10.00% |
| Apr 2027 | $75,770 | $1,100 | $74,670 | $7,467 | 10.00% |
| May 2027 | $172,332 | $2,700 | $169,632 | $16,963 | 10.00% |
| Jun 2027 | $297,267 | $4,700 | $292,567 | $30,182 | 10.32% |
| Since launch | $569,542 | $8,750 | $560,792 | $57,004 | 10.16% |
Origination funnel
RFP 6 · Appendix 1 · 1Centre owns the journey1Centre owns the customer relationship, so the most useful thing FundTap can hand back is a clear view of what happened to the businesses you introduced, including where they stopped and why. Drop-off reasons are coded at the step, not inferred afterwards.
June 2027, introduced to funded
conversion shown against the step aboveWhy 89 were declined
21.5% of completed applications| Adverse credit history | 37 |
| Insufficient trading history | 27 |
| Industry outside current policy | 14 |
| Unable to verify the business or director | 11 |
| Total | 89 |
Every declined applicant is told the reason and, where the decline is about timing rather than the business, when to come back. 27 of the 89 are invited to reapply after six months of trading.
Where 32 stopped mid-application
the fixable losses| Accounting connection step | 21 |
| Director and ownership detail | 11 |
| Total | 32 |
On FundTap's own book only 27.9% of sign-ups ever connect their accounting software, and it is the single strongest predictor of whether a business funds. In this cohort 84% connect, because the journey asks at the moment the customer already has a reason to. The 21 who stopped there are item 2 on the work list.
New Zealand and Australia
June 2027| NZ | AU | |
|---|---|---|
| Introduced | 213 | 283 |
| Completed | 181 | 233 |
| Approved | 145 | 180 |
| First funded | 52 | 47 |
| Funding rounds | 248 | 213 |
| Value funded | $4.86M | $3.67M |
| Average round | $19,600 | $17,220 |
Australia is 57.1% of introductions and 43.0% of value funded. The same inversion shows on FundTap's direct book, where Australia is the larger source of sign-ups and New Zealand the larger source of revenue. Worth understanding rather than assuming.
Funnel by month
15 February 2027 to 30 June 2027Funding activity
RFP 2 · 6 · 6.2dWhat the cohort did once funded. FundTap customers fund repeatedly rather than once, and the repeat rate is where the value of an introduction accumulates for both parties. Funding size is always measured per funding round, one customer on one day, because a customer commonly funds several invoices at once.
Value funded by month
gross invoice value of funding roundsThe numbers behind it
a row per measure| Measure | Jun 27 | May 27 | Apr 27 | Since launch |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Funding rounds | 461 | 299 | 176 | 1,013 |
| Value funded | $8,528,500 | $5,471,700 | $3,168,000 | $18,518,200 |
| Average funding round | $18,500 | $18,300 | $18,000 | $18,281 |
| Advanced to customers | $7,675,650 | $4,924,530 | $2,851,200 | $16,666,380 |
| Invoices per funding round | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.9 |
| Median term to repayment | 26 days | 27 days | 27 days | 26 days |
| Realised fee rate on value funded | 5.10% | 5.10% | 5.10% | 5.10% |
| Customers funding this month | 205 | 139 | 86 | 281 distinct |
| Funding for the first time | 99 | 78 | 61 | 281 |
| Returning | 106 | 61 | 25 | n/a |
| Rounds per funding customer | 2.25 | 2.15 | 2.05 | n/a |
| Repeat funding rate | 51.7% | 43.9% | 29.1% | n/a |
| FundTap book, for comparison | 68% | 68% | 68% | n/a |
Speed, against FundTap's own book
the pre-populated journey is the difference| Measure | 1Centre cohort | FundTap book | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median introduction to first funded | 1.0 day | 2.5 days | 2.5x faster |
| Funded within 24 hours | 51% | 42% | +9pp |
| Funded within 48 hours | 72% | 58% | +14pp |
| Approval to funds out, median | 6 minutes | 4 minutes | In line |
| Returning customer, invoice to funds out | 48 minutes | 55 minutes | Faster |
| Decided without manual intervention | 74.0% | 64% | +10pp |
| Accounting software connected at application | 84% | 27.9% | 3.0x |
FundTap book figures are the measured baseline as at 20 August 2026: median 2.5 days sign-up to funded since 1 July 2026, 42% within 24 hours, 58% within 48 hours. The cohort gap is the value of arriving with identity, directors and bank details already verified, and of asking for the accounting connection at the moment the customer already has a reason to give it.
Repeat funding by first-funded cohort
share of each cohort funding again| First funded | Customers | Month +1 | +2 | +3 | +4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2027 | 9 | 67% | 62% | 56% | 54% |
| Mar 2027 | 34 | 56% | 62% | 56% | n/a |
| Apr 2027 | 61 | 57% | 62% | n/a | n/a |
| May 2027 | 78 | 56% | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Jun 2027 | 99 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
The early cohorts are small, so read the percentages beside their denominators. Repeat funding is why the share attaches to the customer rather than the transaction. On FundTap's measured book, 83% to 89% of funded customers fund more than once, and a customer generates about $9,128 of fee revenue in year one.
Industry mix of the funded cohort
share of value funded, June 2027The mix tracks the hub's own shape, with construction and food and beverage leading, as they do in 1Centre's application volumes. FundTap holds a 35% ceiling on any single industry group as a share of total receivables outstanding. Construction is at 34%. See item 3 on the work list.
Portfolio and risk
Appendix 1 · current, new and defaults · RFP 21Centre's brand is on this offering, so the arrears and default position is reported in full every month rather than on request. Collections runs against FundTap's customer. The facility is non-disclosed and stays that way, including in collections: the customer's own debtors are never contacted.
Arrears ageing at 30 June 2027
against $7,351,000 outstanding| Bucket | Balance | Share | Accounts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Within terms | $6,946,000 | 94.5% | 182 |
| 1 to 7 days | $221,000 | 3.0% | 8 |
| 8 to 30 days | $110,000 | 1.5% | 5 |
| 31 to 60 days | $52,000 | 0.7% | 2 |
| 60 days plus | $22,000 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Total | $7,351,000 | 100% | 198 |
Collections and defaults
prevention first, escalation last| Calls made before a direct debit was due | 99 |
| Self-service repayment extensions taken | 46 |
| Formal arrears notices issued | 7 |
| Accounts entering a default state | 4 |
| Accounts recovered to current | 3 |
| In active recovery at month end | 5, $88,600 |
| Defaults registered or receivership | 0 |
| Debtors contacted | 0 |
| Written off since launch | $0 |
Around 90% of customers who enter a default state on FundTap's book pay in full without enforcement, which is why the ladder above runs prevention first and escalation last. Nothing escalates without notice to 1Centre first, so your support team is never the last to know.
Capital available to 1Centre-introduced customers
so the next scenario step is a decision, not a question| Question | June 2027 | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Capital deployed to 1Centre-introduced customers | $7,351,000 | At month end |
| Peak single day deployed | $964,000 | 24 June |
| Funding requests declined or delayed for want of capital | 0 | Since launch |
| Cohort demand at the High scenario, modelled | $34.6M | Within existing facilities |
| New facility, entity or structure required to reach it | None | Confirmed |
| Months of headroom at June's funding rate | More than 24 |
Committed facility amounts are disclosed to 1Centre under the partnership agreement rather than published in a monthly report. What belongs here is the answer to one question: did capital ever slow a 1Centre customer down. It has not.
Compliance, security and data
RFP 3 · 2 · 2.1The reliance arrangement carries the most regulatory weight of anything in this partnership, so it is measured rather than assumed. This section shows how much of 1Centre's verification work FundTap was able to rely on, what had to be redone, and where the evidence trail sits.
Identity and AML reliance
of 414 completed applications| Relied on 1Centre verification, nothing re-collected | 383 (92.5%) |
| Identity re-verified by FundTap | 23 |
| Verification older than policy allows | 13 |
| Beneficial owner not covered by the hub check | 10 |
| Enhanced due diligence triggered | 8 |
| Verification evidence received and retained | 414 of 414 |
| Evidence requests raised by either party | 2, both answered inside 1 business day |
| Applications delayed by an AML step | 4 |
Security and regulatory steps
on the 99 funded this month| General security agreement registered | 99 of 99 |
| Director guarantee held | 99 of 99 |
| Property security required | 0 |
| Only required on facilities above $30,000 | |
| Business purpose declared, Australian customers | 47 of 47 |
| Funding agreement e-signed, prefilled from hub data | 99 of 99 |
| Direct debit mandate prefilled from hub data | 99 of 99 |
| Steps the customer had to repeat | 0 |
Complaints, disputes and privacy
reported whether or not raised with 1Centre| Complaints received | 3 |
| Acknowledged within 1 business day | 3 of 3 |
| Substantive response within 3 business days | 3 of 3 |
| Escalated to external dispute resolution | 0 |
| Hardship applications | 2, both with an arrangement agreed |
| Privacy incidents | 0 |
| Customer information requests | 5, all answered |
| Deletion requests actioned | 1 |
The two screens are not the same test
the cohort passes 1Centre's trade credit screen before it reaches FundTapReported because the two screens ask different questions. 1Centre assesses whether a business can be extended trade credit by a supplier. FundTap assesses whether a specific invoice, debtor and facility can be funded. A business can pass one and fail the other, and knowing the size of that gap is what lets both parties tune the pre-filter rather than guess at it.
Attribution ledger
RFP 6.2cThe 1Centre flag sits on the customer record, not the application, so repeat business is attributed whether the customer comes back through the hub or straight to FundTap. This ledger exists so attribution is a number you can audit each month, not an argument in month six.
June 2027 ledger
every attribution event| Customers tagged 1Centre-originated at approval | 325 |
| Returning customers funded, arrived via the hub | 21 |
| Returning customers funded, came direct to FundTap | 85 |
| Of which still attributed to 1Centre | 85 |
| Repeat funding rounds attributed to 1Centre | 332 of 461 |
| Repeat business value attributed to 1Centre | $6,142,000 |
| Multi-channel candidates resolved on first touch | 9 |
| Resolved to 1Centre | 9 |
| Resolved to another channel | 0 |
| Excluded, already a FundTap customer before the hub | 5 |
| Attribution queries or disputes open | 0 |
The rules this ledger runs on
as agreed at signing| Flag lives on | The customer record, set at handoff, no expiry |
| Repeat facilities | Attributed to 1Centre for the life of the customer |
| Multi-channel | First touch wins, one share only is ever paid |
| Existing FundTap customers | Stay where they are, flagged and excluded at handoff |
| Mechanism | The same partner-origination tagging FundTap runs today for other platform partners |
| Audit | Every row above resolves to a customer ID in the row-level extract |
85 of the 106 returning customers who funded this month came straight to FundTap rather than back through the hub, and all 85 were attributed to 1Centre. That single row is the reason the flag sits on the customer and not on the application: on a transaction-level model, $4.9M of this month's funding would have gone unattributed.
Service level scorecard
RFP 2 · 5 · every commitment in the responseEvery service level FundTap committed to at bid stage, measured monthly. The point of putting them in the same report as the money is that a promise made in a proposal becomes a number you can hold us to.
| Commitment | Target | June 2027 | Volume | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit decision on complete information | 90% within 1 business hour, remainder within 2 | 92.3% within 1 hour, 100% within 2 | 414 | Met |
| Application or onboarding query | Acknowledged within 1 business hour, resolved same business day | Median acknowledgement 14 minutes, 96.9% same day | 258 | Met |
| Payments or arrears query | Acknowledged within 1 business hour, resolved same business day | Median acknowledgement 11 minutes, 97.6% same day | 84 | Met |
| Complaint | Acknowledged within 1 business day, substantive response within 3 | All acknowledged same day, all answered within 2 days | 3 | Met |
| Facility change or new assessment | Decision within 1 business day | 100% within 1 business day | 47 | Met |
| Human contact before first funding | Every new customer | 99 of 99 | 99 | Met |
| Escalation from 1Centre first line | Picked up inside the same hour | Median 9 minutes to first response | 61 | Met |
| Funding paid on the day of approval | Operating standard | 99.4%. Three rounds paid next morning after the bank cutoff | 461 | Watch |
| Support hours, NZ and AU | 8:30am to 7pm New Zealand time, every business day | Held every business day | 22 | Met |
One watch item. The three rounds funded the next morning all arrived after the 4:30pm bank cutoff on the last business day of the month. Fix in progress: a cutoff warning surfaced in the customer journey from 12 July 2027.
Support and engagement
RFP 5 · Appendix 1 CRM rows1Centre's Poppy handles first line. This section shows what reached FundTap anyway, what it was about, and what FundTap did proactively so a customer did not have to ask.
What customers asked about
share of 512 distinct queriesOn FundTap's whole book, inbound runs at roughly one query for every 1.7 active applications. This cohort sits below that, which is what the pre-populated journey should do and is worth watching as the book matures rather than claiming as a win yet.
What FundTap did without being asked
proactive engagement| Engagement | Count | Customers reached |
|---|---|---|
| Human calls to customers | 214 | 186 |
| Calls before a first repayment | 99 | 99 |
| Product email and SMS nurture | 2,180 | 441 |
| Facility limit reviews offered | 61 | 61 |
| Total proactive engagements | 2,554 | 486 distinct |
Automation sits on top of the human cadence rather than in place of it. On FundTap's own book the split runs about 460 human calls and 3,900 automated touches a month, reaching roughly 780 distinct customers, and the human volume did not fall when the automation was added.
Joint measures
1Centre supplies the first three rows| Measure | Jun 2027 | May 2027 | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onboarding NPS, 1Centre survey | +54 | +51 | 1Centre, per Appendix 1 |
| Poppy conversations about funding | 2,411 | 1,908 | 1Centre |
| Handed from Poppy to FundTap | 61 | 47 | Both |
| Satisfaction on FundTap conversations | 4.8 of 5 | 4.7 of 5 | FundTap |
| Customers who left a public review | 19 | 14 | FundTap |
| Customers who asked to leave the offering | 0 | 0 | Both |
Three rows come from 1Centre. They are here because a partner report that shows one side of a joint journey is half a report, and because the onboarding NPS is the number most likely to move first if anything in the funding step is wrong.
Platform and integration
RFP 4.1 · 4.2The integration is a shared surface, so its health belongs in the partner report rather than in a ticket queue. Incidents are listed whether or not 1Centre noticed them.
Availability and incidents
measured against the agreed SLA definition| Availability, month | 99.94% |
| Availability, rolling 90 days | 99.91% |
| Severity 1 incidents | 0 |
| Severity 2 incidents | 1 |
| 18 June 2027, 34 minutes, credit decision queue delayed. No applications lost, all decisions issued inside the service level once cleared. 1Centre notified at 9 minutes. | Closed |
| Planned maintenance windows | 1 |
| 8 June 2027, 2:00am to 3:20am NZT, notified 10 days ahead | As notified |
| Change notifications issued | 3 |
| API version in service | v1, no deprecation scheduled |
Traffic and delivery
what the integration carried| API calls served | 312,400 |
| Median credit decision response | 1.9 seconds |
| 95th percentile decision response | 6.4 seconds |
| Error rate, 5xx | 0.02% |
| Webhook events delivered | 26,800 |
| Delivered on first attempt | 99.87% |
| Failed after retries | 0 |
| Duplicate submissions rejected on idempotency key | 88 |
| Applications lost to a technical failure | 0 |
The data you already have, live
RFP 5f · 4.1 webhook catalogueThis report closes at month end. The account data below does not: it is available to 1Centre in real time so Poppy can answer balance, status and payment questions without transferring the customer. The monthly report is the reconciled, settled view. The live feed is the operating view.
Real-time account and status data
last synced 8 seconds agoScenario tracker and cohort economics
RFP indicative planning scenarios · 6.2dAt bid stage both parties agreed the Low, Base and High scenarios were modelling assumptions rather than forecasts, sitting on a denominator nobody had measured: what share of the hub's new business customers actually invoice on terms. This section reports the measured denominator, and tracks take-up against the scenarios rather than against a plan.
Customers funded per month, actual against scenario
12 months from public launchThe denominator, now measured
1,444 businesses introduced since 15 February 2027| Businesses introduced and assessed | 1,444 |
| Invoice their own customers on terms | 940 (65.1%) |
| Median debtor terms observed | 34 days |
| Median monthly invoiced value | $84,200 |
| New businesses onboarded through the hub, June | 6,240 |
| Addressable at 65.1% | 4,062 |
| Funded, as a share of all new onboards | 1.59% |
| Funded, as a share of the addressable pool | 2.44% |
The Base scenario assumes 3% of new onboards funded within 12 months of launch. At month three the cohort is at 1.59% on the raw base and tracking the Base ramp. On the measured denominator, 3% of all onboards is 4.6% of the businesses that actually invoice on terms, which is the number worth planning against from here.
What this cohort is worth over time
projected on FundTap's measured book, not on assumption| Measure | Blended | New Zealand | Australia | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fee revenue per funded customer, year 1 | $9,128 | $9,832 | $7,864 | Measured, 853 survivors |
| Fee revenue per funded customer, 60 months | $24,135 | $26,795 | not published | Directional, 127 survivors. Australia has no mature book yet |
| Your share, year 1 | $990 | $1,066 | $853 | At the effective blended rate |
| Your share, life of customer | $2,610 | $2,898 | not published | Effective rate rises toward 11.5% by year 4 |
| 281 customers funded since launch, projected year 1 share | $278,190 | n/a | n/a | Not a forecast of new acquisition |
The bottom row is the value already introduced, carried forward: what the 281 customers 1Centre has already sent are expected to be worth to 1Centre across their first year, on FundTap's measured revenue curve. It assumes no further acquisition at all.
The joint work list
Appendix 1 · monthly executive meetingA report that only says what happened is an archive. These are the five things worth deciding together, carried into the monthly executive meeting on 14 July 2027 as the agenda.
502 activated facilities have never drawn
$23.09M of approved limits sitting unused. FundTap called 164 of them this month and 31 funded as a result, so the contact works. The remaining 338 are a marketing problem rather than a credit one, and 1Centre owns the customer relationship.
The accounting connection is still the biggest fixable loss
21 of the 32 businesses that abandoned mid-application stopped at the accounting connection step. It is the one step in the joint journey that 1Centre data could remove, and it was left open at bid stage.
Construction is at 34% of receivables against a 35% ceiling
FundTap holds a hard cap of 35% for any single industry group as a share of total receivables. The cohort mix is not a FundTap selection, it is the hub's own shape. At the current growth rate the cap binds in the fourth quarter.
Australia converts later and funds smaller
Australia is 57.1% of introductions and 43.0% of value funded, with an average round of $17,220 against $19,600 in New Zealand. The gap is in the days between approval and first funding, not in approval rates.
Decision automation is at 74% against a target of 85%
The remaining manual touches are almost all director verification edge cases: trusts, corporate trustees and directors resident outside New Zealand and Australia.
How this reaches you
RFP 6.2b delivery · 4.1The same content, four ways, so nobody at 1Centre has to wait for a person to run something.
This dashboard
Live from launch. Activity refreshed every 15 minutes, settlement figures locked at month end. Access by named 1Centre user with single sign-on.
Settlement statement
Issued with the payment on the 20th, carrying the same reconciliation chain and the payment reference.
Row-level extract
Every figure in this report down to customer ID, funding round, fee, receipt date and share. Nothing here is a number you have to take on trust.
API
Once the integration is live the whole report is a call, so 1Centre can surface it internally without waiting for FundTap.
GET /v1/partners/1centre/reports/2027-06
Definitions
so a number means the same thing in both companiesIntroduced
A business handed from the 1Centre hub to FundTap with the customer's consent, counted once, on the date of handoff. A business that returns later is not counted again.
Application completed
All information required for a credit decision is present. Applications waiting on the customer are not counted as completed and do not run against the decision service level.
Approved
A credit decision has issued with a facility limit. Approval and first funding are separate events; the gap between them is reported in the funnel.
Facility activated
Funding agreement e-signed and direct debit mandate in place. A customer can be approved without activating, and activated without ever drawing.
Funding round
One drawdown against the facility, one customer on one day. Funding size is always measured per funding round, never per invoice or per quote, because a customer commonly funds several invoices at once. This cohort averages 2.9 invoices per round.
Value funded
Gross invoice value of the funding rounds funded in the month. Advanced is 90% of that, paid to the customer on the day. The balance settles to the customer when their debtor pays.
Fee charged
One fee per funding round, quoted to the customer upfront: a base rate on the gross amount plus a daily rate for the funding period. There is one fee and it is quoted before the customer commits. No establishment fee, no management fee, no interest margin, and nothing else in the transaction.
Fee received
The fee on a funding round repaid in full. The share arises here and nowhere else, which is why the settlement chain starts at what was funded and ends at what was received.
Shareable fee revenue
Fees received in the month less overdue fees. This is the base the tier bands apply to.
Repeat funding rate
Share of the customers funding in this month who have funded before. FundTap's whole book runs at about 68%; a young cohort climbs toward it.
Arrears, default and write-off
Arrears is a repayment past its due date, aged from that date. A default state is a formal escalation, not simply an overdue balance, and about 90% of customers who enter one pay in full. A write-off is an amount recognised as lost after recovery has ended.
- Every figure here is illustrative. The month, the businesses and the amounts are constructed to show what the report contains and how it reconciles, not to forecast anything. The rates and ratios underneath them are FundTap's measured data as at 20 August 2026.
- The tier bands are shown measured on 1Centre-attributed shareable revenue. Whether the gates are measured on that or on FundTap's gross monthly revenue is a commercial term still to be agreed, and it changes which column the rate is read from, not the structure of the report.
- Availability is shown to demonstrate the reporting mechanism. The committed availability figure and its measurement definition are set in the partnership agreement, not in this report.
- Three groups of measures in this report need instrumentation FundTap is building ahead of the pilot opening on 15 February 2027: service level attainment, query response times, and satisfaction. They appear here because they are what FundTap intends to report, and the build is scoped into the integration.
- Figures marked “FundTap book” are stated for comparison only: median 2.5 days sign-up to funded since 1 July 2026, 42% funded within 24 hours, 58% within 48 hours, 12-month fee revenue per funded customer $9,128 across 853 survivors, repeat funding 68%, accounting software connected on 27.9% of sign-ups.
- Capital committed to the partnership is disclosed to 1Centre under the partnership agreement rather than published in a monthly report.
Prepared for 1Centre by FundTap · Sample for RFP question 6.2b ·
Seascape (2010) Limited, registered financial service provider FSP528906
Confidential to 1Centre and FundTap. Not for circulation.